Deciding on 'Beauty and the Beast' this weekend? This should help

http://videos.usatoday.net/Brightcove2/29906170001/201703/3219/29906170001_5352020393001_5352022842001.mp4

Belle has more say in how things goand the cast is more inclusive in this "Beauty and the Beast," says azcentral.com movie critic Bill Goodykoontz.

He goes on:

"The 1991 version exists as unsullied as ever. And the new version does nothing to dishonor it. It’s not the classic that film was, but it ain’t bad.

In fact it’s better than that — it’s quite good, thanks to the sturdiness of the story, the jaw-dropping visuals and, most importantly, the one thing the first film didn’t offer: Emma Watson."