Why the ruling on the South China Sea is significant
International panel rules against China expansion in South China Sea
An international tribunal ruled Tuesday that China can’t legally claim ownership of 90% of the South China Sea – an area roughly the size of Mexico. It also said China violated Philippine sovereignty under U.N. law.
Why is it significant?
Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam have overlapping claims in the region. It’s the first time an international tribunal has delivered an opinion on the disputes. The Philippines filed suit in 2013 after China forcibly took control of Scarborough Shoal, which the Philippines claims is within its exclusive economic zone.
Does it matter?
China refused to participate in deliberations and says it does not recognize the ruling. While the decision can’t be enforced, it will have an effect on future negotiations.
What China claims
China claims virtually all of the South China Sea, including the Paracels and the Spratlys, two chains of small islands and reefs. Other countries claim some or all of those chains, as well.
Why are they valuable?
About 40% of world shipping passes through the area. The islands are home to prime fishing grounds and they’re also believed to be rich in oil and natural gas.
What’s China done?
China has built at least seven landfill islands in the region, some with military capable airstrips, ports and extensive land facilities. It’s also stepped up military maneuvers in the area and the U.S. has sent Navy ships in response.
What’s the tribunal?
The Permanent Court of Arbitration is located in The Hague, Netherlands. It’s not a court, but organizes arbitration panels that try to resolve international disputes. The China decision was rendered by a panel of five members from Ghana, France, Poland, the Netherlands and Germany.