Newsom says he's suing Trump admin to block tariffs, citing harm to California's economy
California Gov. Gavin Newsom and AG Rob Bonta say the Trump's administration's emergency tariffs are illegally harming their state.

- The suit argues Trump's use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose tariffs is unlawful because the act doesn't authorize tariffs.
- California officials are invoking the Supreme Court's "major questions doctrine," arguing that significant economic actions require clear Congressional authorization.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state's Attorney General Rob Bonta sued President Donald Trump on April 16, seeking an immediate ruling to stop his wide-reaching tariffs, alleging that they're poised to "hurt states, consumers, and businesses."
Tariffs have an outsized impact on California businesses, they argued in a news released, including more than 60,000 small business exporters. The tariffs will also affect access to construction materials critical to rebuilding after the Los Angeles fires, they said, including timber, wood, steel, aluminum and key drywall components. Some country-specific tariffs will also impact farmers and ranchers, according to the California leaders.
“President Trump’s unlawful tariffs are wreaking chaos on California families, businesses, and our economy — driving up prices and threatening jobs. We’re standing up for American families who can’t afford to let the chaos continue,” Newsom said in the release.
The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, requests the court immediately halt the sweeping tariffs imposed by Trump against nations around the world, saying he lacks the authority to impose them through the International Economic Emergency Powers Act unilaterally, and is "creating immediate and irreparable harm to California, the largest economy, manufacturing, and agriculture state in the nation."
That act, passed by Congress in 1977, affords a U.S. president a broad set of powers to be used in an emergency, but does not include tariffs as an option, California state officials argued, making Trump's recent actions unlawful.\
During a press conference on April 16, Bonta described Trump’s actions as an attempt to override Congress — and thereby “trampling over his own party" in control of Congress — and “steamroll” the separation of powers.
Supreme Court showdown between California, Trump administration likely
The filing appears to set the stage for a showdown before the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. The lawsuit will invoke what's known as the Supreme Court’s major questions doctrine. That means "in matters of vast economic and political significance, federal agencies and the executive branch must have clear and specific authorization from Congress."
In recent years, California officials noted, the high court has used the standard to strike down major initiatives, including President Barack Obama’s Clean Power Plan and President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness program.
They say it's time to do the same with Trump, arguing he lacks the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs against Mexico, China and Canada or create an across-the-board 10% tariff, and that his use of the International Emergency Powers Act to enact them is "unlawful and unprecedented."
"It is difficult to imagine a more economically significant set of actions than the one Trump is taking on tariffs, which have inflicted hundreds of billions of dollars in economic losses on a whim, using a statute that doesn’t mention tariffs," the release from Newsom's office said. "The Court, applying this doctrine even-handedly, will find that such expansive action absent congressional approval is a clear violation of the law."
Bonta this week argued, “The President’s chaotic and haphazard implementation of tariffs is not only deeply troubling, it’s illegal. As the fifth largest economy in the world, California understands global trade policy is not just a game."
"Californians are bracing for fallout from the impact of the President’s choices — from farmers in the Central Valley, to small businesses in Sacramento, and worried families at the kitchen table," he added.
California's huge economy
California’s gross domestic product was $3.9 trillion in 2023, state officials say, which is 50% bigger than the nation’s next-largest state, Texas. The state also sends over $83 billion more to the federal government than it receives in federal funding, and is the leading agricultural producer in the country. It also has over 36,000 manufacturing firms employing over 1.1 million Californians.
Those firms, sometimes spurred by California regulations against harmful products or pollution, have created new industries and supplied the world with goods spanning aerospace, computers and electronics and, most recently, zero-emission vehicles
California engaged in nearly $675 billion in two-way trade in 2024, and its economy and workers rely heavily on trade, officials say, particularly with Mexico, Canada, and China — the state's top 3 trade partners. Over 40% of the Golden State's imports come from these countries, totaling $203 billion of more $491 billion in goods imported by California in 2024.
The three countries are also the state's top three export destinations, buying nearly $67 billion in California exports, over one-third of the state’s $183 billion in exported goods in 2024.
Trump has argued that lopsided imports over exports, like those in the Golden State, are a national emergency and security risk. But California officials see it differently.
"As the largest economy in the nation, the largest agricultural state, and the largest U.S. trading partner, the harm of the tariffs on California is immense. President Trump’s policies have already inflicted hundreds of billions of dollars in economic losses," the governor's office said in its release.
The lawsuit comes after Newsom announced a goal for the Golden State to create new strategic trade relationships with international partners. The Coachella Valley, like other areas, depends heavily on Canadian winter residents, so-called snowbirds who own and rent properties and visit to escape cold weather.
(This story has been updated with minor phrasing changes.)
Janet Wilson is a senior environment reporter for The Desert Sun and co-authors USA Today Climate Point. She can be reached at jwilson@gannett.com.