Conservative Supreme Court won't weigh in on reviving parental approval rule for abortions
Montana's attorney general argues the federal constitution gives parents the right to make medical decisions for their children.
WASHINGTON – The conservative Supreme Court on July 3 declined to review a ruling that teenagers don’t need their parents’ permission to get an abortion in Montana, a move that disappointed abortion opponents who have collected wins on the issue in recent years.
But two of the court's six conservative justices − Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas − said that court may in the future find a better case to decide whether the parents have a federal constitutional right to grant or withhold their consent for an abortion.
“It is therefore especially important that the denial of review is not read by interested parties or other courts as a rejection of the argument that the petition asks us to decide,” Alito wrote in a statement joined by Thomas.
The Montana Supreme Court ruled last year that the state’s parental consent law violated the privacy clause in Montana’s constitution.
The law was passed in 2013 but never took effect. It required doctors receive written consent from a parent or guardian before performing an abortion on a minor unless she receives a waiver from a court.
The Montana Supreme Court said the state constitution gives minors the same fundamental rights as adults. Any exceptions lawmakers want to carve out must be backed by a strong state interest that increases protections for minors.
“A minor’s right to dignity, autonomy, and the right to choose are embedded in the liberties found in the Montana Constitution,” state Supreme Court Justice Laurie McKinnon wrote in the unanimous decision.
The court also said Montana illogically concluded that "minors who choose to carry their pregnancies are not at risk of making an immature decision, while those choosing abortion must be protected against their immaturity."
The state told the Supreme Court that parents have a federal right to participate in their children’s major medical decisions.
“A state-created privacy interest cannot displace parents’ fundamental right to direct their children’s medical care, since the latter is protected by the U.S. Constitution,” lawyers for Montana told the Supreme Court.
Planned Parenthood, which brought the challenge, said the state was improperly trying to inject a federal argument into a case that is about state constitutional law.
And the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning the federal right to an abortion, Planned Parenthood said, “does not diminish the independent force of these state constitutional safeguards.”