Refugees aren't a threat, but their kids sure are: Column

The announcement by more than two dozen governors that they'd reject the resettlement of Syrian refugees in their states was an understandable reaction to the news that at least one of the Paris attackers evidently inserted himself in the refugee stream that entered Europe through Greece. Aside from the dubious constitutionality of what the governors propose, which conflicts with the exclusive federal jurisdiction over immigration policy, is the fact that potential attackers of the United States are already comfortably situated in Europe and are either holding passports that can get them through U.S. border checks or soon will.

Once asylum seekers in European Union countries achieve citizenship, they are eligible to secure a coveted passport from an EU member country, which exempts the holder from the requirement to obtain a visa. But even if we were to impose such a visa requirement, an EU passport would still be a surer ticket to legal entry into the USA than one from any other region of the world. This questions whether our imposition of stringent new controls on EU citizens would cause a serious deterioration of our trans-Atlantic relationships. Such measures, nonetheless, are likely to be proposed in the wake of the Paris attacks.

Paradoxically, a Syrian refugee from a camp in Lebanon or Jordan would be a less risky admission to the U.S. than a holder of a European passport from a country that has admitted tens of thousands of asylum seekers with little or no screening. It is possible, in theory, to screen the 10,000 refugees that President Obama has proposed welcoming. It is time consuming, and immigrant advocates have complained about the prolonged wait for clearance, but a thorough vetting once completed would make a Syrian among the safest candidates for admission to this country. By way of contrast, it is not really possible, even with the best technology, to vet the hundreds of thousands of refugees who have flocked and continue to flock to the countries of Western Europe.

What makes the threat from terrorists already resident in Western Europe so much more acute for us is that many of them are native-born French, Belgians and Germans who enjoy rights as citizens such as due process and also cannot be deported. Moreover, they have access to technologies to cover their electronic tracks that are not likely to be available to a Syrian in a Jordanian refugee camp.

POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media

There is a hidden assumption in the arguments of both the governors and the Republican presidential hopefuls that the 10,000 Syrians Obama wants to allow here are all Muslims. That is almost certainly not the case. Some of the earliest refugees were Christians or members of minority sects. Furthermore, Syria is probably the most secular of all the Muslim countries in the Middle East. And even if the majority are Muslim, the application of a religious test to immigrants brings up bitter memories of the World War II immigration quotas that limited the admission of Jews suffering from Nazi persecution. The rejection by the United States of those fugitive Jews was, for many of them, tantamount to a death sentence.

If we face danger from a future terrorist attack on our country, it is likely to come not from the suburbs of Beirut but from the suburbs of Brussels. The determination of governors to shield their residents from the hypothetical threat from Syrian refugees would be better directed to impressing upon their congressional delegations the need to appropriate more money for the screening of visitors to America from countries that most closely resemble us in democratic values but who have proved to be an all too comfortable a haven for those whose malicious intentions threaten us all.

Ross K. Baker, a political science professor at Rutgers University, is a member of Paste BN's Board of Contributors and the author of Is Bipartisanship Dead? A Report From the Senate.

In addition to its own editorials, Paste BN publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the Opinion front page.